Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
- Previous Model is Olympus E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic FZ35, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-330 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the FZ35 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-330 scores against the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-330 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-330
FZ35 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | March 2006 | Fresher by 52 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FZ35
E-330 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 has got exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has sizing of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic FZ35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-330 versus the FZ35.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and FZ35 is 65 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and FZ35.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ35 will render more detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 397 grams (0.88 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $999 |