Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
- Older Model is Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS20
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS30
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS25, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-330 was announced 7 years earlier than the ZS25 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-330 scores versus the ZS25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS25
E-330 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-330
ZS25 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | March 2006 | More modern by 82 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS25
E-330 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS25 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-330 compared to the ZS25.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and ZS25 is 65 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and ZS25.
All in all, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS25 will result in greater detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-03-18 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,100 | $300 |