Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front
Portability
90
Imaging
37
Features
57
Overall
45

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Panasonic ZS50
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
  • Launched January 2015
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ70
  • Old Model is Panasonic ZS45
  • Later Model is Panasonic ZS60
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview

Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS50, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was announced 9 years earlier than the ZS50 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-330 matches up against the ZS50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS50

 E-330 ZS50 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-330

 ZS50 E-330 
LaunchedJanuary 2015March 2006More modern by 107 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k215kClearer screen (+825k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS50

 E-330 ZS50 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS50 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 against the ZS50.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and ZS50 is 65 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and ZS50.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS50 will offer greater detail with its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic ZS50 Portrait photography advice
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
42
focusing manually
includes face detect focusing
saves RAW files
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography highlights
Panasonic ZS50 Street photography highlights
60
tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
68
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lighter than others (243g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS50 as a Sports photography camera
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (7MP)
43
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS50
50
lighter than competitors in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
resolution not great (7MP)
display is not selfie friendly
66
lighter than others (243g)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (720mm)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZS50 as a Landscape photography camera
45
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse recording
51
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
Panasonic ZS50 Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
34
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (243g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS50
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 Lumix DMC-TZ70
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2006-03-18 2015-01-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 215k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,166k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.46x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 6.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 pounds) 243 grams (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 44
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.2
DXO Low light score not tested 138
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $1,100 $350