Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f10a/6f10a47131c9d5756aa9d066ef058620213d1e35" alt="Pentax K-30 front Pentax K-30 front"
63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced October 2012
- Newer Model is Pentax K-50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and K-30 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and K-30 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-330 was launched 7 years before the K-30 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-330 matches up versus the K-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Pentax K-30. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Pentax K-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Pentax K-30
E-330 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-30 over the Olympus E-330
K-30 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2012 | ![]() | March 2006 | More recent by 80 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Pentax K-30
E-330 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 offers external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Pentax K-30 has dimensions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 against the K-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/259d5/259d5ce4c55ceeeebb8e5ff77437970894d34e9a" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and K-30 is 65 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da9d4/da9d4bf5ab2e0aba7534296604247afea7a036b8" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and K-30.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax K-30 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2c9/3c2c9a4ca8d45b3a2b6876493bc0a2432af028fc" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2bec/b2bec5121298677646abb8f27ff2dc6ad8d4c140" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Pentax K-30 |
Other name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2012-10-29 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Prime M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 45 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 650 gr (1.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $525 |