Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS

Portability
65
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Pentax WG-3 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced July 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview

Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-330 and Pentax WG-3 GPS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The E-330 was brought out 8 years prior to the WG-3 GPS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-330 scores versus the WG-3 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-330 WG-3 GPS 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-330

 WG-3 GPS E-330 
AnnouncedJuly 2013March 2006More modern by 89 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kSharper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-330 WG-3 GPS 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 offers external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).

See the Olympus E-330 and Pentax WG-3 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-330 versus the WG-3 GPS.

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and WG-3 GPS is 65 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The image underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and WG-3 GPS.

All in all, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will give greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography information
Pentax WG-3 GPS Portrait photography information
54
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
40
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography features
Pentax WG-3 GPS Street photography features
60
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616g)
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (238 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography details
Pentax WG-3 GPS Sports photography details
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
68
weather proofing
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery life (240 per charge)
more heavy than competitors (238 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Pentax WG-3 GPS Landscape photography factors
44
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
53
has manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
weather proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low battery life (240 per charge)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging features
Pentax WG-3 GPS Vlogging features
9
can't record video
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than competitors (238 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
 Olympus E-330Pentax WG-3 GPS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Pentax
Model Olympus E-330 Pentax WG-3 GPS
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-03-18 2013-07-19
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lb) 238 gr (0.52 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $1,100 $350