Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and WG-30W (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and WG-30W (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-330 was brought out 9 years prior to the WG-30W and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-330 scores against the WG-30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 and Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Ricoh WG-30W
E-330 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus E-330
WG-30W | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | ![]() | March 2006 | Fresher by 104 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Ricoh WG-30W
E-330 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 has exterior dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-330 versus the WG-30W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/080ca/080ca3c16404618105ade462020c8c06f554ffbe" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and WG-30W is 65 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ef47/4ef476492fbd9cb1ab89c1fc702679cbfd3162cd" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and WG-30W.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-30W will offer you more detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b3ef/9b3ef0935479f30eac2068b5dc7569937694e5fd" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df0aa/df0aa080eae315e9caae0ad4a3180c87c8060d97" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Also called | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,100 | $280 |