Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Previous Model is Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Also referred to as Wi-Fi
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and Galaxy Camera (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and Galaxy Camera (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-330 was brought out 8 years prior to the Galaxy Camera which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-330 matches up against the Galaxy Camera with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Samsung Galaxy Camera. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
| E-330 | Galaxy Camera | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Olympus E-330
| Galaxy Camera | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2013 |  | March 2006 | More modern by 84 months |
| Display dimensions | 4.8" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+2.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 215k | Clearer display (+707k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung Galaxy Camera
| E-330 | Galaxy Camera | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 has physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-330 compared to the Galaxy Camera.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and Galaxy Camera is 65 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The pic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and Galaxy Camera.
All in all, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung Galaxy Camera will offer greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Samsung Galaxy Camera | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
| Also called | EVOLT E-330 | Wi-Fi |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2006-03-18 | 2013-02-19 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 300 grams (0.66 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,100 | $450 |