Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-450
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Revealed May 2010
  • Also Known as WB5500
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-330 versus Samsung HZ50W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was launched 5 years before the HZ50W and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-330 matches up against the HZ50W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung HZ50W

 E-330 HZ50W 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-330

 HZ50W E-330 
RevealedMay 2010March 2006Fresher by 50 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung HZ50W

 E-330 HZ50W 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 versus Samsung HZ50W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-330 and the HZ50W.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and HZ50W is 65 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and HZ50W.

Plainly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung HZ50W will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography features
Samsung HZ50W Portrait photography features
54
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (7MP)
46
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports RAW files
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography information
Samsung HZ50W Street photography information
60
screen tilts
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition (616g)
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Samsung HZ50W
40
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
48
great zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography details
Samsung HZ50W Travel photography details
50
lighter than competition (616g)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
58
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
long zoom (676mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Time Lapse mode
51
you can focus manually
rather wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging highlights
Samsung HZ50W Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
24
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Samsung HZ50W
 Olympus E-330Samsung HZ50W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-330 Samsung HZ50W
Also called as EVOLT E-330 WB5500
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2006-03-18 2010-05-03
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-676mm (26.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus range - 10cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 426g (0.94 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $1,100 $250