Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Previous Model is Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Released September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-330 was revealed 6 years earlier than the MV800 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-330 grades vs the MV800 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Samsung MV800. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung MV800
| E-330 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-330
| MV800 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 | March 2006 | More recent by 66 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Clearer display (+245k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung MV800
| E-330 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 offers physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-330 against the MV800.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and MV800 is 65 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and MV800.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung MV800 will show greater detail because of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Samsung MV800 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Micro SD |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $1,100 | $499 |