Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800

Portability
65
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Samsung MV800 front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
43
Overall
40

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-450
Samsung MV800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
  • Released September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was revealed 6 years earlier than the MV800 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-330 grades vs the MV800 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung MV800

 E-330 MV800 
Manually focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-330

 MV800 E-330 
ReleasedSeptember 2011March 2006More recent by 66 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung MV800

 E-330 MV800 
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 offers physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-330 against the MV800.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and MV800 is 65 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and MV800.

Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung MV800 will show greater detail because of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung MV800 as a Portrait photography camera
54
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low megapixels (7MP)
34
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Street photography camera
Samsung MV800 as a Street photography camera
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than others (616 grams)
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
73
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
lighter than others (121g)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung MV800 as a Sports photography camera
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
44
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung MV800 as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than others (616g)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
71
lighter than others (121g)
supports touch focus
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography features
Samsung MV800 Landscape photography features
44
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
43
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Samsung MV800
9
no video shooting
34
reasonably wide (26mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
lighter than others (121 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Samsung MV800
 Olympus E-330Samsung MV800
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-330 Samsung MV800
Also called as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-03-18 2011-09-01
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lbs) 121 grams (0.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Micro SD
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $1,100 $499