Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000

Portability
65
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Samsung NX2000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
62
Features
68
Overall
64

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Samsung NX2000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
  • Released November 2013
  • Earlier Model is Samsung NX1100
  • Successor is Samsung NX3000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview

Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-330 and Samsung NX2000, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) use different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-330 was introduced 8 years earlier than the NX2000 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-330 scores versus the NX2000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung NX2000

 E-330 NX2000 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-330

 NX2000 E-330 
ReleasedNovember 2013March 2006More recent by 93 months
Display dimension3.7"2.5"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1152k215kCrisper display (+937k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung NX2000

 E-330 NX2000 
Manual focus More precise focus
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 offers physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has specifications of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-330 and Samsung NX2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 against the NX2000.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and NX2000 is 65 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and NX2000.

As you can see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX2000 will result in greater detail using its extra 13MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Samsung NX2000
54
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low MP (7MP)
77
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
saves RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography details
Samsung NX2000 Street photography details
60
tilting screen
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
77
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
offers focus via touch
lighter than others in class (228 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Samsung NX2000 Sports photography factors
40
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
61
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Samsung NX2000
50
lighter than average (616g)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
low MP (7MP)
display is not selfie friendly
72
lighter than others in class (228g)
offers focus via touch
good megapixels (20MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Samsung NX2000
44
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse mode
72
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
bigger than average screen (3.7 inches)
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX2000 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
35
touch screen
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (228g)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Samsung NX2000
 Olympus E-330Samsung NX2000
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-330 Samsung NX2000
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2006-03-18 2013-11-30
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 400 25600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 21
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Number of lenses 45 32
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3.7 inches
Display resolution 215k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 228g (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 75
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 908
Other
Battery life - 340 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $1,100 $599