Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill

Portability
65
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
55
Features
33
Overall
46

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-450
Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Updated by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was brought out 6 years prior to the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-330 scores versus the DP2 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill

 E-330 DP2 Merrill 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus E-330

 DP2 Merrill E-330 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012March 2006More recent by 71 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kClearer screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sigma DP2 Merrill

 E-330 DP2 Merrill 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 comes with outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 compared to the DP2 Merrill.

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and DP2 Merrill is 65 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and DP2 Merrill.

As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will offer greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution (7 megapixels)
73
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Merrill Street photography advice
60
tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
65
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Sigma DP2 Merrill Sports photography factors
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (7MP)
44
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2 Merrill Travel photography factors
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
low resolution (7MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
54
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography features
Sigma DP2 Merrill Landscape photography features
44
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
no Time Lapse mode
55
manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging advice
Sigma DP2 Merrill Vlogging advice
9
no video recording
22
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
 Olympus E-330Sigma DP2 Merrill
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus E-330 Sigma DP2 Merrill
Alternate name EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Released 2006-03-18 2012-02-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 4704 x 3136
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s -
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s -
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640x480
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 330g (0.73 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $1,100 $931