Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sigma SD15 front
Portability
59
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Replaced the Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Sigma SD15
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Earlier Model is Sigma SD14
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-330 versus Sigma SD15, both Advanced DSLR cameras by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and SD15 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was manufactured 4 years before the SD15 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-330 matches up against the SD15 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sigma SD15

 E-330 SD15 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Olympus E-330

 SD15 E-330 
LaunchedFebruary 2010March 2006More recent by 47 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kSharper screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sigma SD15

 E-330 SD15 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 offers outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sigma SD15 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") along with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-330 versus Sigma SD15 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-330 and the SD15.

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and SD15 is 65 and 59 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and SD15.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-330 will produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography advice
Sigma SD15 Portrait photography advice
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (7MP)
50
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low resolution (5 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography advice
Sigma SD15 Street photography advice
60
screen tilts
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (616g)
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
52
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Sigma SD15 Sports photography factors
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
38
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (5MP)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Sigma SD15
50
lighter than competitors (616 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (7MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
42
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low resolution (5MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Sigma SD15
45
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (2.5 inches)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
51
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3")
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (5 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging advice
Sigma SD15 Vlogging advice
9
can't record video
9
no video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD15 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sigma SD15
 Olympus E-330Sigma SD15
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus E-330 Sigma SD15
Also called as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Launched 2006-03-18 2010-02-20
Body design Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - True II
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 5 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 2640 x 1760
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Available lenses 45 76
Crop factor 2.1 1.7
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.6x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lbs) 750 grams (1.65 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $1,100 $1,500