Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
63 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Released October 2017
- Succeeded the Sony A7R II
- New Model is Sony A7R IV
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-330 and Sony A7R III, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A7R III (Full frame) boast different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-330 was announced 12 years prior to the A7R III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-330 matches up against the A7R III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Sony Alpha A7R III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A7R III
E-330 | A7R III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Olympus E-330
A7R III | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2017 | March 2006 | More modern by 141 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 215k | Sharper display (+1225k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A7R III
E-330 | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sony A7R III has specifications of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") and a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
See the Olympus E-330 and Sony A7R III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 and the A7R III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and A7R III is 65 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The image underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and A7R III.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A7R III will provide you with greater detail with its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2017-10-25 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 32000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 45 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 657 grams (1.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Launch price | $1,100 | $2,800 |