Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front
Portability
67
Imaging
50
Features
50
Overall
50

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Sony A330
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Older Model is Sony A300
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A330 (10MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A330 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was brought out 4 years earlier than the A330 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-330 scores vs the A330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A330

 E-330 A330 

Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus E-330

 A330 E-330 
AnnouncedMay 2009March 2006Fresher by 38 months
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A330

 E-330 A330 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 has got external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony A330 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).

See the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 vs the A330.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and A330 is 65 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and A330.

As you can see, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A330 will show greater detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Sony A330
54
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low MP (7MP)
62
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Sony A330 Street photography info
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average in class (616g)
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
75
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Sony A330 Sports photography factors
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
50
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low MP (10 megapixels)
not so great battery power (230 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography highlights
Sony A330 Travel photography highlights
50
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (7 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
44
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
not so great battery power (230 CIPA)
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography details
Sony A330 Landscape photography details
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
no image stabilization
low MP (7MP)
low max ISO (400)
no Time Lapse mode
54
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inch)
low MP (10 megapixels)
not so great battery power (230 per charge)
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging factors
Sony A330 Vlogging factors
9
can't shoot video
9
lack of video recording
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A330
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2006-03-18 2009-05-18
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 529g (1.17 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 535
Other
Battery life - 230 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $1,100 $545