Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Old Model is Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Earlier Model is Sony A380
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A390 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-330 was introduced 5 years earlier than the A390 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-330 scores versus the A390 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A390
| E-330 | A390 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-330
| A390 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | March 2006 | More recent by 53 months |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A390
| E-330 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 has got physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 and the A390.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and A390 is 65 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and A390.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A390 will result in more detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $1,100 | $500 |