Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Released July 2010
  • Earlier Model is Sony A380
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A390 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was introduced 5 years earlier than the A390 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-330 scores versus the A390 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A390

 E-330 A390 

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-330

 A390 E-330 
ReleasedJuly 2010March 2006More recent by 53 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A390

 E-330 A390 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 has got physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 and the A390.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and A390 is 65 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and A390.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A390 will result in more detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A390 Portrait photography highlights
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
MP count low (7MP)
72
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Sony A390 Street photography info
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616g)
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
76
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Sony A390 Sports photography factors
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
low battery power (230 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography highlights
Sony A390 Travel photography highlights
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
MP count low (7MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
53
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
low battery power (230 per charge)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography advice
Sony A390 Landscape photography advice
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Timelapse function
61
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low battery power (230 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging details
Sony A390 Vlogging details
9
no video recording
9
no video
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A390
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Also called as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2006-03-18 2010-07-28
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3136 x 2352 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 549g (1.21 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 607
Other
Battery life - 230 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $1,100 $500