Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
67
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Announced October 2008
  • New Model is Sony A99
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A900, both Advanced DSLR cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A900 (25MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A900 (Full frame) come with different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-330 was brought out 3 years before the A900 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-330 matches up against the A900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A900

 E-330 A900 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus E-330

 A900 E-330 
AnnouncedOctober 2008March 2006More modern by 31 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k215kCrisper display (+707k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A900

 E-330 A900 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-330 and the A900.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and A900 is 65 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The pic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and A900.

All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony A900 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 18MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A900 Portrait photography highlights
54
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
72
has manual focus
MP count high (25 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW files
no liveview
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography details
Sony A900 Street photography details
60
screen tilts
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW files
weather proof
no articulating screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Sony A900 Sports photography factors
40
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
71
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count high (25 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
weather proof
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography details
Sony A900 Travel photography details
50
lighter than others (616g)
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
55
weather proof
MP count high (25MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography information
Sony A900 Landscape photography information
45
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
does not have Time Lapse mode
73
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count high (25 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW files
weather proof
2 card slots
no liveview
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Sony A900
9
no video recording
9
no video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A900
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Alternative name EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2006-03-18 2008-10-22
Physical type Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 25MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 6048 x 4032
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 895g (1.97 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 79
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 880 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single Dual
Retail price $1,100 $2,736