Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
52
Overall
55

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Announced February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-F3
  • Successor is Sony a5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-3N, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-330 was brought out 8 years earlier than the NEX-3N and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-330 grades against the NEX-3N when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony NEX-3N

 E-330 NEX-3N 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-330

 NEX-3N E-330 
AnnouncedFebruary 2013March 2006Fresher by 84 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-3N

 E-330 NEX-3N 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

See the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-3N in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 vs the NEX-3N.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and NEX-3N is 65 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and NEX-3N.

As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-3N will produce more detail having its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Portrait photography camera
54
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (7 megapixels)
66
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no external flash support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Sony NEX-3N
60
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
77
screen tilts
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography information
Sony NEX-3N Sports photography information
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7 megapixels)
53
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
better than average battery life (480 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Sony NEX-3N Travel photography features
50
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (7MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
71
better than average battery life (480 per charge)
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-3N
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7MP)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
70
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a good size (3")
good resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (480 CIPA)
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging info
Sony NEX-3N Vlogging info
9
can't record video
28
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing external mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-3N
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Also called as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2006-03-18 2013-02-25
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3136 x 2352 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 400 16000
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lb) 269 gr (0.59 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 1067
Other
Battery life - 480 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $1,100 $399