Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-5R front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
76
Overall
64

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Sony NEX-5R
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
  • Revealed August 2012
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-5N
  • Refreshed by Sony NEX-5T
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview

Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and NEX-5R (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was revealed 7 years before the NEX-5R which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-330 grades against the NEX-5R with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony NEX-5R

 E-330 NEX-5R 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus E-330

 NEX-5R E-330 
RevealedAugust 2012March 2006More modern by 78 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kSharper display (+705k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-5R

 E-330 NEX-5R 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5R has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-330 and the NEX-5R.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and NEX-5R is 65 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The image below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and NEX-5R.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-5R will offer you more detail because of its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-5R as a Portrait photography camera
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
74
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-5R as a Street photography camera
60
tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors (616 grams)
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
80
screen tilts up and down
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
provides touch to focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Sony NEX-5R
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
68
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking focus
comes with phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-5R as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competitors (616g)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
73
provides touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-5R
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
75
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
decent sized screen (3")
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging features
Sony NEX-5R Vlogging features
9
can't record video
31
touchscreen capability
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-5R
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha NEX-5R
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha NEX-5R
Other name EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2006-03-18 2012-08-29
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 400 25600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 99
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 276 grams (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 910
Other
Battery life - 330 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $1,100 $750