Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Introduced August 2012
  • Old Model is Sony NEX-C3
  • New Model is Sony NEX-3N
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-F3, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was introduced 7 years earlier than the NEX-F3 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the E-330 matches up vs the NEX-F3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony NEX-F3

 E-330 NEX-F3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-330

 NEX-F3 E-330 
IntroducedAugust 2012March 2006More modern by 78 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kSharper screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-F3

 E-330 NEX-F3 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has got physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has specifications of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

See the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-F3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-330 against the NEX-F3.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and NEX-F3 is 65 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and NEX-F3.

Clearly, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony NEX-F3 will produce more detail using its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography advice
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography advice
54
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low megapixels (7MP)
74
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Sony NEX-F3
60
tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
76
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Sony NEX-F3 Sports photography factors
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
53
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great battery (470 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography highlights
Sony NEX-F3 Travel photography highlights
50
lighter than others in class (616 grams)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (7MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
69
great battery (470 per charge)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Sony NEX-F3 Landscape photography factors
45
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
70
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
great battery (470 per charge)
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging factors
Sony NEX-F3 Vlogging factors
9
can't shoot video
27
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-F3
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Alternate name EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2006-03-18 2012-08-16
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 400 16000
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lbs) 314 grams (0.69 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $1,100 $470