Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Introduced February 2016
  • Succeeded the Sony A6000
  • Replacement is Sony A6500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 Overview

Following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-330 and Sony A6300, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-330 was released 11 years before the A6300 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-330 scores against the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A6300

 E-330 A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-330

 A6300 E-330 
IntroducedFebruary 2016March 2006More modern by 120 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k215kClearer display (+707k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A6300

 E-330 A6300 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 provides external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-330 and Sony A6300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-330 vs the A6300.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and A6300 is 65 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing specs. The picture below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and A6300.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A6300 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography info
Sony A6300 Portrait photography info
54
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (7MP)
80
you can focus manually
decent MP (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography information
Sony A6300 Street photography information
60
tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
79
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
great high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Sony A6300 Sports photography factors
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
75
decent MP (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography info
Sony A6300 Travel photography info
50
lighter than competitors (616g)
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
MP count low (7 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
76
weather sealing
decent MP (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography features
Sony A6300 Landscape photography features
45
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
no Timelapse mode
79
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3")
decent MP (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Sony A6300
9
no video shooting
35
features face detection autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone support
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A6300
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha a6300
Also called EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2006-03-18 2016-02-03
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 51200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 425
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Highest video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lb) 404g (0.89 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 85
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1437
Other
Battery life - 400 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $1,100 $889