Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha a6400 front
Portability
83
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-450
Sony A6400
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
  • Revealed January 2019
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-330 and Sony A6400, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A6400 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was unveiled 14 years prior to the A6400 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-330 scores vs the A6400 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A6400

 E-330 A6400 

Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Olympus E-330

 A6400 E-330 
RevealedJanuary 2019March 2006More modern by 156 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution922k215kClearer screen (+707k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A6400

 E-330 A6400 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 provides physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Sony A6400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-330 vs the A6400.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and A6400 is 65 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and A6400.

Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A6400 will show greater detail having an extra 17 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography information
Sony A6400 Portrait photography information
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
resolution not great (7MP)
81
focusing manually
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Street photography camera
Sony A6400 as a Street photography camera
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (616g)
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
81
tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
boasts focus by touch
weather proofing
great ISO range (32,000)
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography details
Sony A6400 Sports photography details
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
76
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography details
Sony A6400 Travel photography details
50
lighter than others in class (616g)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
resolution not great (7MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
87
weather proofing
connects via bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
good megapixels (24MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A6400 as a Landscape photography camera
45
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (7MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Timelapse function
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great ISO range (32,000)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Sony A6400
9
can't record video
80
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes mic support
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A6400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A6400
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha a6400
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha a6400
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2006-03-18 2019-01-15
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3136 x 2352 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 400 32000
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 102400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 425
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Available lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.7x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 11.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lbs) 403 grams (0.89 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 83
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.6
DXO Low light score not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 410 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant)
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $1,100 $898