Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Revealed May 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-330 and Sony H20, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and H20 (10MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and H20 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-330 was released 4 years prior to the H20 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-330 matches up versus the H20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony H20
| E-330 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus E-330
| H20 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2009 |  | March 2006 | Newer by 38 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony H20
| E-330 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 comes with exterior dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony H20 has measurements of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Sony H20 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 and the H20.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and H20 is 65 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and H20.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sony H20 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-330 vs Sony H20 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
| Alternative name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2006-03-18 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $1,100 | $249 |
