Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a60/49a601b81dc9ac950ac3b4b1df8dd7ab514aa7ad" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front"
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
- Replaced the Olympus E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus E-330 versus Sony HX300, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-330 was released 8 years earlier than the HX300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-330 scores versus the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony HX300
E-330 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-330
HX300 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | ![]() | March 2006 | Newer by 84 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony HX300
E-330 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 has got exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-330 versus Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 versus the HX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5af26/5af26bfbe9c9dbf9b0054f520a841fe23d26d768" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and HX300 is 65 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14403/144039278f6a481ff34dbb8c8e63abfc2bb8d21f" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The image underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and HX300.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony HX300 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/744b6/744b638a2d5df710bf8c1a0646a90b2c1f090b99" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08bed/08bedb16d90f12bd55a102dde85263096871eefb" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 623g (1.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,100 | $339 |