Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
46
Features
51
Overall
48

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Sony HX350
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
  • Launched December 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 Overview

Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-330 versus Sony HX350, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and HX350 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and HX350 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was released 11 years prior to the HX350 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-330 grades vs the HX350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony HX350

 E-330 HX350 

Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus E-330

 HX350 E-330 
LaunchedDecember 2016March 2006More recent by 131 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k215kSharper display (+707k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony HX350

 E-330 HX350 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sony HX350 has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") having a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-330 versus Sony HX350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-330 against the HX350.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and HX350 is 65 and 62 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and HX350.

To sum up, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX350 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Sony HX350
54
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
MP count low (7MP)
47
manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Sony HX350
60
tilting screen
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than others in class (616g)
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
50
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than competition (652 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Sony HX350
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
53
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Sony HX350 Travel photography features
50
lighter than others in class (616g)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (7 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
54
megapixel count good (20MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (652 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography features
Sony HX350 Landscape photography features
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
49
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging features
Sony HX350 Vlogging features
9
no video
27
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no external mic socket
heavier than competition (652 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony HX350
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350
Alternative name EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2006-03-18 2016-12-20
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3136 x 2352 5184 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 202k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 8.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lbs) 652 gr (1.44 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $1,100 -