Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V front
Portability
62
Imaging
45
Features
60
Overall
51

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
  • Launched February 2014
  • Old Model is Sony HX300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-330 and Sony HX400V, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and HX400V (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and HX400V (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was launched 9 years prior to the HX400V which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-330 matches up vs the HX400V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony HX400V

 E-330 HX400V 

Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Olympus E-330

 HX400V E-330 
LaunchedFebruary 2014March 2006More modern by 96 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kSharper screen (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony HX400V

 E-330 HX400V 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sony HX400V has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-330 and Sony HX400V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 versus the HX400V.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and HX400V is 65 and 62 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and HX400V.

Clearly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony HX400V will show greater detail utilizing its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Sony HX400V
54
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
MP count low (7MP)
51
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography details
Sony HX400V Street photography details
60
screen tilts up and down
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average (616g)
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
50
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (660g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography features
Sony HX400V Sports photography features
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX400V as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than average (616 grams)
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
MP count low (7MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
53
megapixel count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (660 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography features
Sony HX400V Landscape photography features
45
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
no image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse recording
49
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX400V as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
29
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes external microphone port
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competitors in class (660g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX400V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony HX400V
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-03-18 2014-02-12
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3136 x 2352 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 8.50 m (ISO Auto)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash)
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lbs) 660 gr (1.46 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $1,100 $448