Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
45
Features
37
Overall
41

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-450
Sony QX30
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
  • 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and QX30 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and QX30 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-330 was introduced 9 years prior to the QX30 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 matches up versus the QX30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony QX30

 E-330 QX30 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size2.5""Larger display (+2.5")
Display resolution215k0kSharper display (+215k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus E-330

 QX30 E-330 
IntroducedSeptember 2014March 2006More modern by 103 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony QX30

 E-330 QX30 
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 comes with outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony QX30 has measurements of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-330 vs the QX30.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and QX30 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The pic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and QX30.

All in all, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony QX30 will produce more detail using its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Sony QX30
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
MP count low (7MP)
38
MP count good (20 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Sony QX30 Street photography info
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616g)
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography information
Sony QX30 Sports photography information
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
47
great zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (200 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography information
Sony QX30 Travel photography information
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (7MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
65
boasts touch focus
MP count good (20 megapixels)
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (200 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography highlights
Sony QX30 Landscape photography highlights
45
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
39
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small ( inch)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery life (200 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
Sony QX30 Vlogging information
9
can't record video
35
relatively wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony QX30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony QX30
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Lens-style
Revealed 2006-03-18 2014-09-03
Physical type Mid-size SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-6.3
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch -
Display resolution 215k dots 0k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye None
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-BN,
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $1,100 $348