Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
75
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Introduced October 2015
  • Succeeded the Sony RX1R
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-330 and Sony RX1R II, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) possess totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was manufactured 10 years earlier than the RX1R II and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-330 grades vs the RX1R II for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony RX1R II

 E-330 RX1R II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-330

 RX1R II E-330 
IntroducedOctober 2015March 2006Fresher by 116 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1229k215kSharper display (+1014k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony RX1R II

 E-330 RX1R II 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 and Sony RX1R II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-330 and the RX1R II.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and RX1R II is 65 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and RX1R II.

To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography advice
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography advice
54
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
85
has manual focus
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
fantastic resolution (42MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography advice
Sony RX1R II Street photography advice
60
tilting screen
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616g)
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
73
screen tilts
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW files
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than average (507 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Sports photography camera
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
62
fantastic resolution (42 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
fixed focal length (35mm)
max fps very slow (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery (220 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Sony RX1R II Travel photography features
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (7MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
59
fantastic resolution (42MP)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery (220 shots)
more heavy than average (507g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (7MP)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
68
has manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
fantastic resolution (42 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
doesnt have low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery (220 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging details
Sony RX1R II Vlogging details
9
lack of video recording
34
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
supports face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external microphone socket
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than average (507g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Released 2006-03-18 2015-10-13
Physical type Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 42MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 7952 x 5304
Maximum native ISO 400 25600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0
Macro focus range - 14cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 507 grams (1.12 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 97
DXO Color Depth score not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.9
DXO Low light score not tested 3204
Other
Battery life - 220 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $1,100 $3,300