Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
93 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
- Older Model is Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-330 versus Sony S2100, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and S2100 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and S2100 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-330 was brought out 4 years earlier than the S2100 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S2100 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-330 matches up vs the S2100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony S2100
| E-330 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Olympus E-330
| S2100 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | March 2006 | Fresher by 46 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony S2100
| E-330 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 has external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony S2100 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 versus Sony S2100 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-330 against the S2100.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and S2100 is 65 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and S2100.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony S2100 will render greater detail having its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $1,100 | $0 |