Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Replaced the Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Announced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and S930 (10MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and S930 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-330 was introduced 3 years earlier than the S930 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S930 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-330 matches up versus the S930 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony S930 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony S930
| E-330 | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 2.5" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
| Screen resolution | 215k |  | 112k | Crisper screen (+103k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Olympus E-330
| S930 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2009 |  | March 2006 | More recent by 34 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony S930
| E-330 | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 provides outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony S930 has dimensions of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 compared to the S930.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and S930 is 65 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and S930.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony S930 will result in greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-330 vs Sony S930 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 320x240 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,100 | $219 |
