Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Also Known as EVOLT E-330
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-330 versus Sony W220, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and W220 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-330 was unveiled 3 years prior to the W220 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-330 matches up versus the W220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony W220
| E-330 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-330
| W220 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 | March 2006 | Newer by 34 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony W220
| E-330 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 features external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 versus Sony W220 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-330 against the W220.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and W220 is 65 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The pic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and W220.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W220 will produce extra detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-330 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 147 gr (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,100 | $160 |