Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500

Portability
65
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
56
Overall
48

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Replaced the Olympus E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-450
Sony WX500
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
  • 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
  • Introduced April 2015
  • Previous Model is Sony WX350
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 Overview

The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and WX500 (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and WX500 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was introduced 10 years before the WX500 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony WX500 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-330 scores against the WX500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony WX500

 E-330 WX500 
Manually focus More precise focus

Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Olympus E-330

 WX500 E-330 
IntroducedApril 2015March 2006Newer by 110 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution921k215kClearer display (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony WX500

 E-330 WX500 
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 offers physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony WX500 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 and the WX500.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and WX500 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The pic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and WX500.

As you have seen, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Sony WX500 will provide more detail using its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX500 Portrait photography highlights
54
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
39
decent MP (18MP)
provides face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography factors
Sony WX500 Street photography factors
60
screen tilts up and down
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
69
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (236 grams)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography features
Sony WX500 Sports photography features
40
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
slow fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
57
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery power (360 CIPA)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX500 as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
71
good battery power (360 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (236g)
decent MP (18MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (720mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony WX500 as a Landscape photography camera
44
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Time Lapse mode
49
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
good battery power (360 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging factors
Sony WX500 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
35
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (236 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony WX500
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2006-03-18 2015-04-14
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3136 x 2352 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-6.4
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 5.40 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lb) 236g (0.52 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 360 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $1,100 $348