Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony SLT-A33 front
Portability
67
Imaging
54
Features
80
Overall
64

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Sony A33
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Launched August 2010
  • Renewed by Sony A35
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A33, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A33 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A33 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was launched 5 years before the A33 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-330 matches up against the A33 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A33

 E-330 A33 

Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus E-330

 A33 E-330 
LaunchedAugust 2010March 2006More modern by 54 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution921k215kClearer display (+706k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A33

 E-330 A33 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 provides external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony A33 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A33 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-330 versus the A33.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and A33 is 65 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and A33.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A33 will render more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography information
Sony A33 Portrait photography information
54
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (7 megapixels)
72
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Sony A33
60
screen tilts
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
76
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography advice
Sony A33 Sports photography advice
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
low battery pack (340 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography information
Sony A33 Travel photography information
50
lighter than average (616g)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (7 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
61
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low battery pack (340 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Sony A33
45
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
67
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
low battery pack (340 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging factors
Sony A33 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
77
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A33
 Olympus E-330Sony SLT-A33
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony SLT-A33
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2006-03-18 2010-08-24
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 500g (1.10 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 591
Other
Battery life - 340 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $1,100 $230