Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
70
Overall
61

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-450
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Replaced the Sony A33
  • Replacement is Sony A37
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A35, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A35 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was manufactured 6 years prior to the A35 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-330 matches up versus the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A35

 E-330 A35 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-330

 A35 E-330 
LaunchedSeptember 2011March 2006Newer by 67 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kSharper screen (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A35

 E-330 A35 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 features exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Sony A35 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A35 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 and the A35.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and A35 is 65 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and A35.

As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A35 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Sony A35
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
MP count low (7MP)
73
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Street photography camera
Sony A35 as a Street photography camera
60
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
71
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average in class (415 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography advice
Sony A35 Sports photography advice
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
low fps (6.0 fps)
terrible battery life (440 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A35 as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
MP count low (7 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
58
lighter than average in class (415g)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (440 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A35 Landscape photography highlights
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
low max ISO (400)
no Time Lapse mode
69
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
terrible battery life (440 shots)
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Sony A35
9
can't record video
36
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external mic socket
lighter than average in class (415g)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A35
 Olympus E-330Sony SLT-A35
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony SLT-A35
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2006-03-18 2011-09-20
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 400 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 215k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lbs) 415g (0.91 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 763
Other
Battery life - 440 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $1,100 $598