Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
68 Imaging
62 Features
72 Overall
66
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 16000 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 492g - 129 x 95 x 78mm
- Announced November 2013
- Previous Model is Sony A57
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A58, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A58 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A58 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-330 was released 8 years before the A58 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A58 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-330 grades versus the A58 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Sony SLT-A58. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony A58 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A58
| E-330 | A58 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A58 over the Olympus E-330
| A58 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | March 2006 | Newer by 93 months |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 215k | Crisper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A58
| E-330 | A58 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A58 has dimensions of 129mm x 95mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 492 grams (1.08 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A58 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 against the A58.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and A58 is 65 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and A58.
As you can see, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A58 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Sony SLT-A58 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Sony SLT-A58 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2013-11-27 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 16000 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 215k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.65x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lbs) | 492 grams (1.08 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 129 x 95 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 753 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 690 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $1,100 | $645 |