Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony SLT-A58 front
Portability
68
Imaging
62
Features
72
Overall
66

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Sony A58
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000 (Bump to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 492g - 129 x 95 x 78mm
  • Announced November 2013
  • Previous Model is Sony A57
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A58, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A58 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A58 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-330 was released 8 years before the A58 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A58 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-330 grades versus the A58 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A58

 E-330 A58 

Reasons to pick Sony A58 over the Olympus E-330

 A58 E-330 
AnnouncedNovember 2013March 2006Newer by 93 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A58

 E-330 A58 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A58 has dimensions of 129mm x 95mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 492 grams (1.08 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 versus Sony A58 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 against the A58.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and A58 is 65 and 68 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and A58.

As you can see, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A58 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography factors
Sony A58 Portrait photography factors
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
delivers RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Sony A58 Street photography info
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (616g)
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
78
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Sony A58
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
81
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
good battery life (690 per charge)
supports phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography factors
Sony A58 Travel photography factors
50
lighter than competition (616g)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (7MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
63
good battery life (690 CIPA)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A58 as a Landscape photography camera
45
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
70
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (690 per charge)
screen is small (2.7")
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
Sony A58 Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
35
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with mic jack
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A58 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A58
 Olympus E-330Sony SLT-A58
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony SLT-A58
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2006-03-18 2013-11-27
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 400 16000
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.6
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.65x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lbs) 492 grams (1.08 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 129 x 95 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 753
Other
Battery life - 690 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $1,100 $645