Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d7a/99d7a0804ed60f6f44afcaa95ce459edbbe50dd6" alt="Olympus FE-5020 front Olympus FE-5020 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-400 and Olympus FE-5020, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FE-5020 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-400 was unveiled 3 years before the FE-5020 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-400 grades vs the FE-5020 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus FE-5020
E-400 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-400
FE-5020 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 34 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus FE-5020
E-400 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 comes with outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5020 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 and Olympus FE-5020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-400 vs the FE-5020.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4890/d489053c7f4d2ad556611ece422cd3101f786d78" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and FE-5020 is 77 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08388/08388023b3ef184d39662ab45a8241aad63c607d" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FE-5020.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus FE-5020 will resolve more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bfe1/5bfe159d6f8727d302478eba1985a592a6646c62" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9316d/9316d97c098aeadb3a61bafafba0c58c4c77f76b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus FE-5020 |
Alternative name | - | X-935 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $160 |