Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 9000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-400 was revealed 3 years before the 9000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-400 scores against the 9000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus 9000
E-400 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-400
9000 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2009 | September 2006 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus 9000
E-400 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-400 against the 9000.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and 9000 is 77 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and 9000.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus 9000 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $599 | $300 |