Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus TG-810, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-400 was announced 5 years earlier than the TG-810 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-400 matches up vs the TG-810 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-810
E-400 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-400
TG-810 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 59 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-810
E-400 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus TG-810 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-400 versus the TG-810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/706f8/706f888b63947473c1d9ce0e7223b169f19906aa" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and TG-810 is 77 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dcff/0dcff65ade6514eae6af0addbf615bd25214d3ec" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and TG-810.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-810 will show more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71a33/71a333298adb8de986f6051ee865fcc7f5e3fbf2" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91195/911955e26fe34cb2b0a228e02cad84dd29ee608c" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-810 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | $428 |