Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
40
Overall
37

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
  • Launched May 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview

In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was manufactured 6 years prior to the TG-1 iHS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-400 matches up versus the TG-1 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS

 E-400 TG-1 iHS 
Manual focus Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-400

 TG-1 iHS E-400 
LaunchedMay 2012September 2006Fresher by 68 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution610k215kSharper display (+395k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-1 iHS

 E-400 TG-1 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 and the TG-1 iHS.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and TG-1 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and TG-1 iHS.

As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will deliver greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
46
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
no manual control
low resolution sensor (10MP)
27
includes face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography details
Olympus TG-1 iHS Street photography details
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-1 iHS Sports photography info
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
better than average battery pack (350 shots)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography details
49
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
68
better than average battery pack (350 CIPA)
weather proofing
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
no Time Lapse recording
low resolution (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography highlights
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
46
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging features
9
no video recording
36
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
 Olympus E-400Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS
Type Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Announced 2006-09-14 2012-05-08
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 610 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 230g (0.51 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 and 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Card slots One One
Cost at release $599 $399