Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ce5/77ce56bcec511e7aab885ff155154eb3bca39025" alt="Olympus VH-515 front Olympus VH-515 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VH-515, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-400 was revealed 7 years earlier than the VH-515 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-400 matches up vs the VH-515 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Olympus VH-515. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus VH-515
E-400 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-400
VH-515 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 72 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VH-515
E-400 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VH-515 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 compared to the VH-515.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed4e2/ed4e25a074a2719ff18ac4c2a1c8250c35f03a72" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and VH-515 is 77 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f96b8/f96b81a044ef1db3593e32dd6f880f29446aabd0" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and VH-515.
As you can tell, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VH-515 will render more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c49f/4c49fd6c5ab7763bf5514acfda4e71fc55b290dd" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bcc2/7bcc2cdd3010585a6014bd03027b63c7167529bf" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus VH-515 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $599 | $648 |