Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Renewed by Olympus E-410
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-400 was released 5 years prior to the XZ-1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-400 scores versus the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus XZ-1

 E-400 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-400

 XZ-1 E-400 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011September 2006More recent by 53 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution614k215kClearer display (+399k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-1

 E-400 XZ-1 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 vs the XZ-1.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and XZ-1 is 77 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and XZ-1.

To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-400 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography details
46
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (10 megapixels)
45
manual focus
has face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography features
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography features
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
more heavy than average (275g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery life (320 shots)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-1
49
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
62
good battery life (320 CIPA)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (275 grams)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
45
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse mode
54
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (320 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging features
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging features
9
can't shoot video
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than average (275g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-1
 Olympus E-400Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus XZ-1
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2006-09-14 2011-01-26
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3664 x 2752
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 215k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 pounds) 275g (0.61 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 34
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 117
Other
Battery life - 320 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $599 $567