Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-400 was released 5 years prior to the XZ-1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-400 scores versus the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus XZ-1
E-400 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-400
XZ-1 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 53 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+399k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-1
E-400 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 vs the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a865/9a8658788c3317a53fc10a22c4fc68201ae697a2" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and XZ-1 is 77 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6bce/d6bcec2769cbd6787df81839c53a13fdf0f99ed9" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and XZ-1.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-400 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c8b3/2c8b3d7e3bedf9547a80cb8b344fda84d9bd3428" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c3d/e0c3d8aff9da2001dee80c06f2ba2ea0a5866bfd" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $599 | $567 |