Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
31
Overall
33

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Updated by Olympus E-410
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released January 2011
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FX78, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is very well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was launched 5 years before the FX78 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-400 matches up against the FX78 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FX78

 E-400 FX78 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-400

 FX78 E-400 
ReleasedJanuary 2011September 2006Fresher by 53 months
Display dimensions3.5"2.5"Larger display (+1")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FX78

 E-400 FX78 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FX78 has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FX78 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 compared to the FX78.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and FX78 is 77 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FX78.

Clearly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX78 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX78
46
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
manual mode not available
low MP (10MP)
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Panasonic FX78
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Sports photography camera
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
28
has image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (200 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Panasonic FX78
49
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
low MP (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
56
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low battery (200 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic FX78 Landscape photography highlights
45
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
36
fairly wide (24mm)
big screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
manual exposure not available
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low battery (200 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Panasonic FX78
9
no video recording
33
fairly wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FX78
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Also Known as - Lumix DMC-FX77
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-09-14 2011-01-25
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.5-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3.5 inch
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lbs) 142 grams (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $599 $210