Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front
Portability
72
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Panasonic FZ35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
  • 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
  • Released July 2010
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was revealed 4 years prior to the FZ35 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the FZ35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FZ35

 E-400 FZ35 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-400

 FZ35 E-400 
ReleasedJuly 2010September 2006Fresher by 46 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ35

 E-400 FZ35 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") having a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 vs the FZ35.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and FZ35 is 77 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FZ35.

To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ35 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography info
Panasonic FZ35 Portrait photography info
45
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
lack of manual mode
low MP (10MP)
41
you can focus manually
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography highlights
Panasonic FZ35 Street photography highlights
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography factors
Panasonic FZ35 Sports photography factors
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
34
great zoom range (27-486mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ35 Travel photography highlights
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
52
built-in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
great reach (486mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ35 as a Landscape photography camera
44
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
41
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging highlights
Panasonic FZ35 Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
26
reasonably wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ35
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Also called as - Lumix DMC-FZ38
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2006-09-14 2010-07-06
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 27-486mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-4.4
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 397g (0.88 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures))
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $599 $999