Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Released July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was revealed 4 years prior to the FZ35 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the FZ35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-400 | FZ35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-400
FZ35 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | September 2006 | Fresher by 46 months | |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ35
E-400 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") having a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 vs the FZ35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and FZ35 is 77 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FZ35.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ35 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 397g (0.88 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $599 | $999 |