Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and PX (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and PX (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was manufactured 5 years before the PX which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-400 scores against the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh PX
| E-400 | PX |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus E-400
| PX | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 | September 2006 | More modern by 59 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh PX
| E-400 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 versus the PX.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and PX is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and PX.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh PX will give greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Ricoh PX |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 156g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $599 | $329 |