Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and PX (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and PX (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was manufactured 5 years before the PX which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-400 scores against the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh PX

 E-400 PX 

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus E-400

 PX E-400 
IntroducedAugust 2011September 2006More modern by 59 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh PX

 E-400 PX 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 versus the PX.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and PX is 77 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and PX.

Clearly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh PX will give greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Portrait photography camera
45
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
42
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography information
Ricoh PX Street photography information
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-400
Sports photography with Ricoh PX
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography details
Ricoh PX Travel photography details
49
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
68
weather proof
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography information
Ricoh PX Landscape photography information
44
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
does not have liveview
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
no Timelapse recording
47
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Ricoh PX
9
can't shoot video
31
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh PX
 Olympus E-400Ricoh PX
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-400 Ricoh PX
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2006-09-14 2011-08-16
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3072
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 156g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $599 $329