Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Released August 2012
- Superseded the Samsung NX200
- Replacement is Samsung NX300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and NX210 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and NX210 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-400 was revealed 7 years prior to the NX210 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX210 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-400 matches up against the NX210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Samsung NX210. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung NX210
| E-400 | NX210 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Olympus E-400
| NX210 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | September 2006 | More modern by 72 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 215k | Crisper screen (+399k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX210
| E-400 | NX210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 offers external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX210 has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the NX210.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and NX210 is 77 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and NX210.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung NX210 will result in more detail because of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Samsung NX210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Samsung NX210 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2012-08-14 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Available lenses | 45 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 719 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $625 |