Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
65 Imaging
72 Features
93 Overall
80
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Updated by Sony A9 II
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A9 (24MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A9 (Full frame) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-400 was revealed 11 years earlier than the A9 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-400 grades vs the A9 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Sony Alpha A9. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A9
| E-400 | A9 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Olympus E-400
| A9 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2017 | September 2006 | Fresher by 129 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1440k | 215k | Clearer display (+1225k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A9
| E-400 | A9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony A9 has specifications of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-400 vs the A9.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and A9 is 77 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and A9.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A9 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A9 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony Alpha A9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Alpha A9 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2017-04-19 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 847.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 20.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 673 grams (1.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 92 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 3517 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
| Storage slots | 1 | Two |
| Pricing at launch | $599 | $4,498 |