Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony W220, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the W220 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-400 was revealed 3 years before the W220 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-400 scores versus the W220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W220
E-400 | W220 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-400
W220 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2009 | September 2006 | Newer by 28 months | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W220
E-400 | W220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-400 versus Sony W220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-400 against the W220.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and W220 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and W220.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Sony W220 will offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 147 grams (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $160 |