Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony W220, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the W220 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-400 was revealed 3 years before the W220 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-400 scores versus the W220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W220

 E-400 W220 

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-400

 W220 E-400 
RevealedJanuary 2009September 2006Newer by 28 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W220

 E-400 W220 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-400 versus Sony W220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-400 against the W220.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and W220 is 77 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and W220.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Sony W220 will offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
Sony W220 Portrait photography features
45
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
no manual control
MP count low (10 megapixels)
27
has manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography factors
Sony W220 Street photography factors
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W220 as a Sports photography camera
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Sony W220 Travel photography information
49
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse function
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
low MP (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W220 as a Landscape photography camera
44
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
does not have liveview
no manual control
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
missing Time Lapse function
32
has manual focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Sony W220
9
lack of video recording
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony W220
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2006-09-14 2009-01-08
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 30-120mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-7.1
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 147 grams (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $599 $160