Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
28
Overall
32

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2006
  • Renewed by Olympus E-410
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 Overview

Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the W290 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W290 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was brought out 3 years prior to the W290 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-400 scores versus the W290 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W290

 E-400 W290 

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus E-400

 W290 E-400 
RevealedFebruary 2009September 2006More modern by 29 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W290

 E-400 W290 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony W290 has proportions of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-400 versus the W290.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and W290 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The pic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and W290.

To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sony W290 will render extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography info
Sony W290 Portrait photography info
46
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
low MP (10 megapixels)
27
has manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Sony W290
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
56
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W290 as a Sports photography camera
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
25
image stabilization (Optical)
slow fps (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Sony W290 Travel photography information
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
57
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Sony W290
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
41
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging information
Sony W290 Vlogging information
9
no video
28
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony W290
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2006-09-14 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.90 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 167 grams (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $599 $230