Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
99 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- n/ag - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WX9 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WX9 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WX9 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony WX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-400 grades vs the WX9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony WX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony WX9
E-400 | WX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony WX9 over the Olympus E-400
WX9 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | September 2006 | More recent by 52 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 215k | Clearer screen (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony WX9
E-400 | WX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony WX9 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 versus the WX9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and WX9 is 77 and 99 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and WX9.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony WX9 will deliver greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX9 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $599 | $188 |