Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
- Successor is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-410 was announced 5 years earlier than the VR-320 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-410 scores versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-410 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus VR-320
E-410 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-410
VR-320 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | June 2007 | Newer by 49 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus VR-320
E-410 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-410 provides exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-410 compared to the VR-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and VR-320 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will resolve extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-410 | Olympus VR-320 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2007-06-14 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | - | $179 |