Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2007
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
  • Successor is Olympus E-420
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-410 was announced 5 years earlier than the VR-320 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-410 scores versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus VR-320

 E-410 VR-320 
Manual focus More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-410

 VR-320 E-410 
LaunchedJuly 2011June 2007Newer by 49 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus VR-320

 E-410 VR-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-410 provides exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-410 compared to the VR-320.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and VR-320 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and VR-320.

As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will resolve extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
56
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
features face detect focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-410
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 Sports photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography factors
42
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
70
lighter than others (158 grams)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-410
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
50
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
42
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging features
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
9
no video shooting
32
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
lighter than others (158g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus E-410Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-410 Olympus VR-320
Also Known as EVOLT E-410 -
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2007-06-14 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 158g (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 494 not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost - $179