Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-410
- Succeeded the Olympus E-400
- Replacement is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Launched January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Updated by Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic ZS35, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-410 was manufactured 7 years before the ZS35 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-410 scores versus the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-410 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-410 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-410
ZS35 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | June 2007 | More modern by 79 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic ZS35
E-410 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 comes with external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-410 against the ZS35.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and ZS35 is 77 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and ZS35.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-410 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS35 will give you greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-410 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2007-06-14 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 305g (0.67 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | - | $300 |